MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01C701B1.8F8BEE20" This document is a Single File Web Page, also known as a Web Archive file. If you are seeing this message, your browser or editor doesn't support Web Archive files. Please download a browser that supports Web Archive, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer. ------=_NextPart_01C701B1.8F8BEE20 Content-Location: file:///C:/CB2C5625/2005AGMminutesMelbourne.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Minu=
tes of
Annual General Meetings (AGMs)
held in
Sund=
ay 23
October 2005
[These minutes were approved on 25
October 2006.]
Present: Entity representatives,
Steering Group members, Collaboration Trading Company Directors, and Secret=
ariat
staff (see Appendix 1 for the list of those who were present, and those who=
had
sent their apologies).
Mark Davies welcomed
everyone to the AGMs, and explained their purpose. He thanked Mike Clarke,
Prathap Tharyan and Pisake Lumbiganon for their presentation about the
Collaboration’s response to the tsunami before the commencement of the
AGMs. The agenda was approved.
Mark explained that a
proportion of the members of The Cochrane Collaboration Steering Group (CCS=
G)
changes each year. He thanked Jim Neilson and Davina Ghersi as they were now
leaving the CCSG; they had both been members for six years, Jim as
Co-ordinating Editor representative and then as Co-Chair, and Davina as Rev=
iew
Group Co-ordinator/Trials Search Co-ordinator (RGC/TSC) representative. Mark
introduced the incoming new members: Donna Gillies (representing authors),
Adrian Grant (representing Co-ordinating Editors), Narelle Willis (represen=
ting
RGCs and TSCs), and Hans van der Wouden (representing members of Cochrane
Review Groups (CRGs)).
Mike Clarke took over as
Chair of the meeting for agenda items 3 to 8. He explained the importance of
these AGMs, including the need to satisfy the legal requirements governing
charities registered in
Mike asked for comments=
or
corrections for the minutes: there were none. Steff Lewis proposed and Rob
Scholten seconded approval of the minutes.
Mike reminded entity
representatives that they had been sent the Annual Report for the year April
2004 to March 2005 on 30 September 2005. He asked for any comments or
questions: there were none. Jordi Pardo proposed the approval of the Annual
Report to Companies House, Janet Wale seconded the proposal, and the motion=
was
carried.
Mike reminded entity
representatives that they had been sent the financial statements for the ye=
ar
April 2004 to March 2005 on 30 September 2005. He asked for any comments or
questions: there were none. Davina Ghersi proposed approval of these financ=
ial
statements; Lisa Bero seconded the proposal, and the motion was carried.
Mike explained that each
year the AGMs need to appoint a firm of accountants; the Trading Company
Directors and the members of the Steering Group had agreed that the present
accountants should be reappointed. He asked for comments or questions: there
were none. Jon Deeks proposed that Mazars LLP be reappointed, Hans van der
Wouden seconded the proposal, and the motion was carried. Jini Hetherington=
was
requested to let Mazars LLP know of this decision.
Action: Jini Hetherington
Mike explained the
requirement to approve the current accounting policies. He asked for commen=
ts
or questions: there were none. Godwin Aja proposed that they be approved, P=
eter
Tugwell seconded the proposal, and the motion was carried. Jini Hetherington
was asked to let Mazars LLP know of this.
Action: Jini Hetherington
Mike explained that one=
of
the three Trading Company Directors (Monica Kjeldstrøm, Peter Langho=
rne
or himself) was required to resign each year and could be reappointed if th=
ey
were willing. Monica stepped down, and Mike proposed that she be reappointe=
d;
this was seconded by Liz Waters, and carried.
Mark Davies resumed the
position of Chair for the rest of the meeting. He reminded everyone that the
Memorandum and Articles of Association of The Cochrane Collaboration had be=
en
approved at the previous AGM in October 2004, and were available on the
Collaboration website. He explained that the Charity’s objects remain=
ed
unchanged, namely, “the protection and preservation of public health
through the preparation, maintenance and dissemination of systematic review=
s of
the effects of health care, for the public benefit.” This concluded t=
he
formal part of the AGMs.
10.1 Collaboration finances: Jon=
Deeks
made a brief presentation about the Collaboration’s finances in his r=
ole
as Treasurer. He showed several graphs indicating the historical trends and
current state of the organisation’s finances as of March 2005. Sales
income from The Cochrane Library had been increasing year on year, as
had the royalty percentage which determined the Collaboration’s share.
Wiley had projected sales income for the current year approaching 1,700,000
pounds sterling, and the Collaboration’s royalty rate was now at forty
per cent. In the past five years the Collaboration had built up a surp=
lus
of funds, which had started to be reduced during the past two years as the
Collaboration committed more expenditure than its likely income. A reserve
level of funds had been identified which the Steering Group aimed to mainta=
in
for contingency purposes year on year. In the past year the main items of
expenditure had been on Secretariat running costs; the Information Manageme=
nt
System; development of the Collaboration’s website; sponsored entity
registration fees for Colloquia; complementary subscriptions to The Coch=
rane
Library for all entities; Steering Group, sub- and advisory group runni=
ng
costs; and development of the processes for preparing reviews of diagnostic
test accuracy.
10.2
ISI and impact
factors: Mark Davies explained that the Instit=
ute
for Scientific Information (ISI) had
evaluated The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) =
and
that CDSR had passed its techni=
cal
evaluation in May 2005. ISI had therefore accepted CDSR for listing and would cover all new and updated Cochrane r=
eviews
from Issue 1, 2005. The first impact factor for CDSR would be released in June 2008. It would be a measure of
citations in 2007 to articles published in 2005 and 2006. Mark stressed the
importance of the accuracy of citations to Cochrane reviews. He congratulat=
ed
Wiley who had been working diligently towards this end; they had provided a
list of Frequently Asked Questions about this to Colloquium participants.
Reviews in CDSR would also be
included on the ISI Web of Science in the Science Citation Index Expanded and in Current
Contents/ Clinical Medicine databases; all of this was increasing accessibi=
lity
to Cochrane reviews.
10.3=
Sustainability an=
d The
Cochrane Collaboration: Mike Clarke presented an item =
on
behalf of Ian Roberts, Co-ordinating Editor of the Cochrane Injuries Group,
relating to carbon emissions. Mike explained that Ian, who was not at the
Colloquium, had asked him to read out a statement on his behalf, and that he
had agreed to do so as Director of the reference Cochrane Centre for the
Cochrane Injuries Group. He read an abridged version of Ian’s stateme=
nt,
and said that a copy of the full statement would be attached to the minutes=
of
this meeting (see Appendix 2). One of the recommendations in Ian’s
statement was the establishment of a working group within the Collaboration.
Sally Green said she recognised the importance of this issue, but pointed o=
ut
that reducing travel would impact far more highly on
There were no further items of business, and the meeting ended after one ho=
ur.
Entity
|
Represented by <= o:p> |
|
Collaborative Review Groups (50): |
|
|
1. Airways Group |
Elizabeth
Arnold |
|
2. Anaesthesia Group |
Nete
Villebro |
|
3. Acute Respiratory Infections Gro=
up |
Liz
Dooley |
|
4. Back Group |
Victoria
Pennick |
|
5. Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Gr=
oup |
Bill
Gillespie |
|
6. Breast Cancer Group |
Sharon
Parker |
|
7. Colorectal Cancer Group |
Henning
Andersen |
|
8. Consumers & Communication
Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
|
Megan
Prictor |
|
9. Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Diso=
rders
Group |
Nikki
Jahnke |
|
10. Dementia and Cognitive Improveme=
nt
Group |
Dymphna
Hermans |
|
11.
Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group |
Rachel
Churchill |
|
12.
Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Group |
Jane
Dennis |
|
13.
Drugs and Alcohol Group |
Apologies |
|
14.
Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group |
Martin
Burton |
|
15.
Epilepsy Group |
Rachael
Jowett |
|
16.
Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group |
Alain
Mayhew |
|
17.
Eyes and Vision Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
&nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; |
Richard
Wormald |
|
18.
Fertility Regulation |
Metin
Gülmezoglu |
|
19.
Gynaecological Cancer Group |
Clare
Jess |
|
20.
Haematological Malignancies Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
|
Thilo
Kober |
|
21.
Heart Group |
William
Hood |
|
22.
Hepato-Biliary Group |
Christian
Gluud |
|
23.
HIV/AIDS Group |
Joy
Oliver |
|
24.
Hypertension Group |
Ciprian Jauca |
|
25.
Incontinence Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
|
June
Cody |
|
26.
Infectious Diseases Group |
Reive
Robb |
|
27.
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
|
Apologies |
|
28.
Injuries Group |
Katharine
Ker |
|
29.
Lung Cancer Group |
Sera
Tort |
|
30.
Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group |
Cindy
Farquhar |
|
31.
Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group |
Susanne
Ebrahim |
|
32.
Methodology Review Group |
Elizabeth
Paulsen |
|
33.
Movement Disorders Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
|
Apologies |
|
34.
Multiple Sclerosis Group &nbs=
p;
&nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; |
Graziella
Filippini |
|
35.
Musculoskeletal Group |
Lara
Maxwell |
|
36.
Neonatal Group |
Roger
Soll |
|
37.
Neuromuscular Disease Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
|
Kate
Jewitt |
|
38.
Oral Health Group |
Emma
Tavender |
|
39.
Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group |
Jessica
Thomas |
|
40.
Pregnancy and Childbirth Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
|
Sonja
Henderson |
|
41.
Prostatic Diseases and Urologic Cancers Group &nbs=
p;
&nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; |
Apologies |
|
42.
Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group |
Heather
Maxwell |
|
43.
Renal Group |
Jonathan
Craig |
|
44.
Schizophrenia Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
|
Mark
Fenton |
|
45.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
|
George
Schmid |
|
46. Skin Group |
Tina Leonard |
|
47.
Stroke Group |
Apologies |
|
48.
Tobacco Addiction Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
|
Apologies |
|
49.
Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
|
Iris
Gordon |
|
50.
Wounds Group |
Nicky
Cullum |
|
|
|
|
Fields/Networks (11): |
|
|
1. Cancer Network |
Mark
Lodge |
|
2. Child Health Field &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
&nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; |
Denise
Thomson |
|
3. Complementary Medicine Field &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
|
Eric
Manheimer |
|
4. Health Care of Older People Fiel=
d &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
|
Gilbert
Ramirez |
|
5. Health Promotion and Public Heal=
th
Field |
Rebecca
Armstrong |
|
6. Neurological Network &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
|
Livia
Candelise |
|
7. Occupational Health &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
&nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; |
Jos
Verbeek |
|
8. Pre-hospital and Emergency Health
Field &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
|
Apologies |
|
9. Primary Health Care Field &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
&nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; |
Glenn
Griffin |
|
10.
Rehabilitation and Related Therapies Field |
Marijke
Moll |
|
11.
Vaccines Field &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
|
Apologies |
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Network &nbs=
p;
&nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; |
Liz
Whamond |
|
|
|
|
Methods Groups (11): |
|
|
1. Applicability and Recommendations
Methods Group |
Apologies |
|
2. Economics Methods Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
<=
span
lang=3DEN-GB style=3D'font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-=
family:
"Arial Unicode MS"'> |
Apologies |
|
3. Individual Patient Data Methods =
Group |
Lesley
Stewart |
|
4. Information Retrieval Methods Gr=
oup |
Carol
Lefebvre |
|
5. Non-Randomised Studies Methods G=
roup |
Barney
Reeves |
|
6.
Patient Reported Outcomes Methods Group |
Donald
Patrick |
|
7. Prospective Meta-Analysis Methods
Group |
Nicole
Holcroft |
|
8. Qualitative Research Methods
Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
|
Apologies |
|
9. Reporting Bias Methods Group |
Jonathan
Sterne |
|
10. Screening and Diagnostic Tests M=
ethods
Group &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; |
|
|
11.
Statistical Methods Group |
Doug
Altman |
|
|
|
|
Centres (12) |
|
|
1.
Australasian Cochrane Centre |
Denise
O’Connor |
|
2.
Brazilian Cochrane Centre |
Alvaro
Atallah |
|
3.
Canadian Cochrane Centre |
Jeremy
Grimshaw |
|
4.
Chinese Cochrane Centre |
Youping Li |
|
5.
Dutch Cochrane Centre |
Mariska
Leeflang |
|
6.
German Cochrane Centre &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
|
Gerd
Antes |
|
7.
Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre |
Xavier
Bonfill |
|
8.
Italian Cochrane Centre |
Alessandro
Liberati |
|
9.
Nordic Cochrane Centre |
Peter
Gøtzsche |
|
10.
South African Cochrane Centre |
Elizabeth
Pienaar |
|
11.
|
Caroline
Rouse |
|
12.
|
Kay
Dickersin |
|
|
|
Total number of
entities: 85
|
|
Godwin Aja
Lorne Becker
Lisa Bero
Mark Davies
Jon Deeks
Zbys Fedorowicz
Davina Ghersi (outgoing member)
Donna Gillies
Adrian Grant
Sally Green
Steff Lewis
Jim Neilson (outgoing member)
Jordi Pardo
Rob Scholten
Peter Tugwell
Janet Wale
Liz Waters
Narelle Willis
Hans van der Wouden
Mike Clarke
Monica Kjeldstrøm
Peter Langhorne &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Apologies
Claire Allen
Jini Hetherington (minutes)
Nick Royle
Diana Wyatt
Appe=
ndix 2
Sta=
tement
on sustainability
by Ian Roberts (Co-ordinating Editor, Cochrane Injuries Group),
to be read out at the AGM of The Cochrane Collaboration
on 23 October 2005 in Melbourne, Australia
I
am grateful for the opportunity to address this meeting in absentia and to
highlight the need for urgent actions to reduce the emissions of greenhouse
gases arising from the activities of The Cochrane Collaboration.
The
UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has reviewed the available
scientific evidence and has concluded that we are now in a period of rapidly
changing global climate, driven mainly by the emissions of greenhouse gases
resulting from the burning of fossil fuels. Current projections are for an
increase in global temperatures of around 1.5 to 6.0 degrees Celsius over t=
his
century. This is a faster rate of change than at any time since the incepti=
on
of agriculture 13,000 years ago. The rate and extent of warming is likely to
have serious consequences for ecosystems and human populations in many regi=
ons.
The WHO estimates that more than 150,000 people in developing countries are
already dying each year from the effects of global warming.
The
Cochrane Collaboration, like all organizations, must acknowledge the threat
posed by climate change and take action to reduce the emissions associated =
with
its activities. How carbon dioxide reductions might equitably be achieved i=
s an
issue for debate. However, it=
seems
likely that agreement would have to be based on the principles of Contracti=
on
and Convergence proposed by the Global Commons Institute. These principles =
are
that global emissions of carbon dioxide must be reduced to an international=
ly
agreed level (contraction); and that global governance must be based on jus=
tice
and fairness with convergence to equal per
capita carbon emission shares. Equitable stabilization scenarios have m=
ajor
implications for high income countries, which are required to begin immedia=
te
and progressive reductions in energy use. Under Contraction and Convergence,
the achievement of 550 ppm stabilization would require a reduction in yearly
emissions for the average UK citizen from about 5.2 tonnes per person per y=
ear
to 2.0 tonnes by 2050; it would require reduction to just over 1 tonne per
person per year if the aim is the more stringent target of 450 ppm which ma=
ny
believe necessary. To set these reductions in context, a round trip by air =
to
Melbourne from Northern Europe corresponds to about 11 tons of carbon dioxi=
de
per person.
I propose the establishment of=
a
standing group of The Cochrane Collaboration charged with the task of promo=
ting
the necessary year on year reductions in CO2 emissions associated
with the Collaboration’s activities. I am confident that the
Collaboration will take this issue seriously. In a period when politicians =
have
promoted lies, the Collaboration has championed truth and the avoidance of
bias. In a time of unprecedented international conflict, The Cochrane
Collaboration has championed international co-operation and inclusiveness. =
Now
facing the prospects of global climate chaos, I have no doubt that the
Collaboration will embrace sustainability. Thank you.