Cochrane Colloquium at Dublin, 2006 - Scientific Presentations, Posters and Workshops

Oral Presentations

  • W01 -
  • [W01] Introduction to umbrella reviews
  • W02 -
  • [W02] Strengthening collaboration between policy makers and evidence providers, and facilitating cooperation
  • W03 -
  • [W03] Identifying and incorporating adverse effects in systematic reviews
  • W04 -
  • [W04] Meta-analysis of continuous data
  • W05 -
  • [W05] Introduction to meta-regression
  • W06 -
  • [W06] Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies
  • W07 -
  • [W07] Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies
  • W08 -
  • [W08] Basics of meta-analysis
  • W09 -
  • [W09] Extracting data for a systematic review of non-randomized studies (NRS) of a public health intervention
  • W10 -
  • [W10] Search filters: choosing, using and abusing
  • W11 -
  • [W11] The need to improve 'Implications for research' sections in Cochrane reviews
  • W12 -
  • [W12] Librarians: facilitators in the Cochrane review process?
  • W13 -
  • [W13] Train the trainer
  • W14 -
  • [W14] Developing dissemination strategies for systematic reviews: the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) approach
  • W15 -
  • [W15] Quality measures of included studies for Cochrane reviews - beyond randomization and blinding
  • W16 -
  • [W16] Introducing GRADEpro® and new features in RevMan 5
  • W17 -
  • [W17] Assessing healthcare interventions along the complex-simple continuum
  • W18 -
  • [W18] The Cochrane Library: hands-on searching (introduction)
  • W19 -
  • [W19] Exploring the need to update systematic reviews
  • W20 -
  • [W20] Methodology Clinic
  • W21 -
  • [W21] Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies
  • W22 -
  • [W22] How to identify and assess the impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis
  • W23 -
  • [W23] Quality assessment of randomized trials
  • W24 -
  • [W24] Equity reviews: challenges, opportunities and next steps
  • W25 -
  • [W25] Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies
  • W26 -
  • [W26] Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies
  • W27 -
  • [W27] Missing data in meta-analysis: a practical guide
  • W28 -
  • [W28] Media training
  • W29 -
  • [W29] The devil in the detail: data extraction forms for systematic reviews of complex interventions
  • W30 -
  • [W30] Summary of Findings (SoF) tables in Cochrane reviews
  • W31 -
  • [W31] To include, or not to include non-randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: a novel approach to a controversial question
  • W32 -
  • [W32] Developments in handsearching - an international and health promotion and public health perspective
  • W33 -
  • [W33] Critical appraisal skills for consumers: understanding the evidence using an online course on evidence-based health care for consumer advocates
  • W34 -
  • [W34] Developing country challenges, solutions and partnerships
  • W36 -
  • [W36] A new tool to incorporate implementation data into systematic reviews - applying the Oxford Implementation Index
  • W37 -
  • [W37] Information Management System (IMS) for Trials Search Co-ordinators (TSCs) in Cochrane Review Groups
  • W38 -
  • [W38] Preparing and writing a Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) review
  • W39 -
  • [W39] Handsearching online journals - do we need new rules?
  • W40 -
  • [W40] Information Management System (IMS) Clinic
  • W41 -
  • [W41] Selecting the best treatment: the role of multiple treatment meta-analysis in Cochrane reviews
  • W42 -
  • [W42] Meta-analysis of cross-over trials
  • W43 -
  • [W43] A demonstration and guide to SCHARP, a software application for the analysis and plotting of individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis
  • W44 -
  • [W44] The Methods for Research Synthesis node of the Economic and Social Research Council's National Centre for Research Methods: methodological challenges in evidence synthesis
  • W45 -
  • [W45] Investigating and dealing with bias in systematic reviews
  • W46 -
  • [W46] Advanced Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) workshop
  • W47 -
  • [W47] Improving 'Implications for research' sections of Cochrane reviews
  • W48 -
  • [W48] Is it possible to develop guidance for HIV care in resource-poor settings with evidence from resource-poor settings?
  • W49 -
  • [W49] Methodological issues in systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies
  • W50 -
  • [W50] Helping to ensure review relevance: exploring the potential benefits and costs of multi-perspective review advisory groups
  • W51 -
  • [W51] Entity websites: a training workshop for webmasters
  • W52 -
  • [W52] Trials Search Co-ordinators' discussion forum (advanced)
  • W53 -
  • [W53] Sifting the evidence: the Achilles heel of the evidence-based medicine (EBM) paradigm
  • W54 -
  • [W54] The Cochrane Library: hands-on searching (advanced)