There is no evidence to support or refute the use of preventive antibiotics in newborn babies with drainage tubes placed in the chest. Sick newborn babies occasionally need the insertion of a tube that is placed through the skin and into the lung space to drain air or fluid from around their lungs. Because this process involves breaching the skin barrier, there is a potential risk of infection. The group of babies most likely to need this procedure are also those that are most at risk of developing an infection during their stay in hospital. Preventive antibiotics are commonly used when there is a risk of infection, but they may have unwanted effects. The review authors found no evidence to support or refute the use of routine preventive antibiotics when intercostal catheters are inserted in newborn babies.
There are no data from randomised trials to either support or refute the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for intercostal catheter insertion in neonates. Any randomised controlled trials of antibiotic prophylaxis would need to account for the fact that neonates who require insertion of an intercostal catheter may already be receiving antibiotics for other indications.
Intercostal catheters are commonly used for the drainage of intrathoracic collections in newborn infants, including pneumothorax and pleural effusions. Placement of an intercostal drain is a potential risk factor for nosocomial infection due to breach of the cutaneous barrier. Therefore, neonates who require intercostal drainage, especially those in high risk groups for nosocomial infection, may benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis. However, injudicious antibiotic use carries the risk of promoting the emergence of resistant strains of micro-organisms or of altering the pattern of pathogens causing infection.
To determine the effect of prophylactic antibiotics compared to selective use of antibiotics on mortality and morbidity (especially septicaemia) in neonates undergoing placement of an intercostal catheter.
The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 5), MEDLINE (1948 to June 2011) and CINAHL (1982 to June 2011).
Randomised controlled trials or some types of non-randomised (that is, quasi-randomised) controlled trials of adequate quality in which either individual newborn infants or clusters of infants were randomised to receive prophylactic antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment.
We used the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.
We did not find any randomised controlled trials that met the eligibility criteria.