Key messages
-
The clotting medicine tranexamic acid (TXA) given during caesarean birth does not prevent heavy bleeding when blood loss is measured by collecting blood and weighing surgical sponges, or when health providers estimate the amount of blood loss. When blood loss is calculated using the proportion of red blood cells in blood before and after the caesarean birth, there is likely a slight reduction in heavy bleeding.
-
TXA probably does not make a difference in the number of women who need further treatment to control heavy bleeding.
-
The effect of TXA on harmful effects is uncertain.
What is the issue?
Heavy bleeding after giving birth (postpartum haemorrhage) is a common and sometimes life-threatening complication of birth. Most women receive drugs that stimulate the womb to contract (uterotonics) after vaginal or caesarean birth to prevent postpartum haemorrhage. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a medication used to decrease blood loss in surgery and health conditions associated with increased bleeding. It works by helping to prevent the breakdown of blood clots. If a woman is bleeding heavily after birth, it decreases blood loss. We do not know if TXA can help prevent heavy bleeding after caesarean birth.
What did we want to find out?
We wanted to know if fewer women receiving TXA at the time of surgery had heavy bleeding after a caesarean section. We also wanted to find out if receiving TXA during surgery was associated with any harmful effects.
What did we do?
We searched for and selected all studies that addressed this question. We used a checklist to make sure we only included studies that we could trust. We made judgements about the quality of the studies before comparing and summarising the results of the studies. Lastly, we rated our confidence in the findings.
Why is this important?
We need to find out whether TXA is effective in preventing heavy bleeding after birth when given to women at the time of a caesarean birth. If TXA works, it could reduce excessive blood loss, the use of further treatment, and possibly complications from heavy bleeding and death.
What did we find?
We identified six studies with a total of 15,981 women that looked at the effects of preventive TXA. We found that TXA results in little to no difference in heavy bleeding after birth when blood loss is measured by collecting blood and weighing surgical sponges, or when health providers estimated the amount of blood loss, compared to placebo (dummy treatment). TXA likely results in a slight reduction of heavy bleeding when blood loss is calculated using the proportion of red blood cells in the blood before and after the caesarean birth. We are very uncertain about the effect of TXA on maternal death, and there is no evidence on the effect of TXA on women developing serious illness.
It is likely that TXA has no effect on the need to receive a blood transfusion, and makes no difference to whether a women needs further surgical treatment. We are very uncertain about the effect of TXA on blood clots. TXA results in little to no difference to whether women require additional drugs to help the womb contract, and we are very uncertain about the effect of TXA on the need for surgical removal of the womb. There does not seem to be a difference between groups in maternal satisfaction, and there is no evidence on the effects of TXA on breastfeeding.
What are the limitations of the evidence?
Most studies included women at low risk of heavy bleeding after birth, preventing any conclusions about women at high risk of heavy bleeding after birth. Across trials, few women experienced harmful effects; however, we cannot be certain that this is the case in the real world.
What does this mean?
We found little to no difference in the number of women experiencing heavy bleeding after birth after they were given TXA preventatively during caesarean birth, and we are very uncertain about the effect of TXA on death, blood clots, and surgical removal of the womb. As these are harmful effects, health providers should take the benefit and the potential harms into account when considering routine treatment with TXA of women during caesarean birth.
There does not seem to be a difference in the number of women needing additional treatment for heavy bleeding after receiving TXA.
Giving every women who gives caesarean birth TXA preventatively during birth is a serious decision with many implications. We need to weigh up blood loss outcomes, as well as the relatively low rates of serious illness after postpartum haemorrhage and uncertainty regarding serious unwanted effects.
How up-to-date is this evidence?
The evidence is current to 20 February 2024.
Prophylactic TXA in addition to standard care during caesarean birth results in little to no difference in estimated blood loss ≥ 1000 mL and likely results in a slight reduction in calculated blood loss ≥ 1000 mL compared to placebo.
There were no data for severe morbidity due to PPH. Event rates for further interventions to control PPH were low and similar across groups. Prophylactic TXA thus results in little to no difference between groups for additional surgical interventions (32 versus 31 per 1000), and likely results in little to no difference between groups for blood transfusions (31 versus 36 per 1000) and use of additional uterotonics (107 versus 121 per 1000).
There were very few events for the outcomes maternal death (1 in placebo group), thromboembolic events (2 versus 3 per 1000), and hysterectomy (1 per 1000 in each group). Evidence for these serious adverse events is therefore very uncertain.
Decisions about implementing routine prophylactic TXA during caesarean birth should not only consider outcomes related to blood loss, but also the relatively low rates of PPH morbidity and uncertainty of serious adverse events.
Most studies included women at low risk of PPH, thereby precluding any conclusions about women at high risk of PPH.
Cost associated with routine use of an additional drug for all caesarean births needs to be considered.
To assess the effects of TXA for preventing PPH compared to placebo or no treatment (with or without uterotonic co-treatment) in women during caesarean birth.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and WHO ICTRP to 20 February 2024 and searched reference lists of retrieved studies.
This Cochrane review was funded in part by the World Health Organization.
The published protocol and updates to the review can be accessed:
Protocol (2009) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007872
Original Review (2010) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007872.pub2
Review Update (2015) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007872.pub3.