Which strategies might influence how accurately and how long people with cystic fibrosis complete chest physiotherapy and exercise?

Background

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a progressive and life-limiting genetic condition that affects many systems in the body, especially the lungs. In the UK, 1 in every 2500 babies is diagnosed with CF. Physiotherapy is a very important part of treatment for people with CF. The two main goals of chest physiotherapy are to clear sticky mucus from the airways to prevent repeated infections and lung damage and to maintain physical fitness through exercise.

Chest physiotherapy can help prevent poor health and hospital admissions and may contribute to improving quality of life and life expectancy, but it is often considered a burden. People with CF may have to complete seven or more chest physiotherapy treatments a day, which can be time-consuming, tiring, and disruptive. As a result, people with CF may complete as little as 30% of their chest physiotherapy sessions, with rates often dipping during some stages in a person's life (such as adolescence). Although exercise is often viewed more positively by people with CF, they may not always carry out their exercises because of tiredness, feeling unwell, or a lack of time.

We wanted to explore what we can do to encourage people with CF to complete more of their planned chest physiotherapy or exercise. We were interested in a range of possible strategies including leaflets, videos, apps, rewards, motivational tools, exercise games, diaries, and text messages.

What did we do?

We looked for high-quality studies of people with CF (aged seven years and upwards). We planned to include any strategy aimed at improving adherence to chest physiotherapy or exercise compared to no strategy, usual care, or another type of strategy.

What did we find?

We found only two studies that we could include in our review. One was an educational study to improve adherence to exercise, and the second was a motivational study to increase adherence to chest physiotherapy.

In the exercise study (34 participants), those who received a written manual seemed to be more physically active at the end of the study, compared to those who were given verbal advice only, but we are not certain whether this was due to the manual. There were no other differences between groups in terms of quality of life, lung function, or exercise capacity.

In the chest physiotherapy study (43 participants), we are uncertain whether listening to specially-composed music during chest physiotherapy leads to more time spent completing treatments. We did not find that listening to music people chose themselves while doing physiotherapy led to completion of more treatment compared to not listening to any music. We did not find any real difference in hospital admissions due to chest infection between any of the groups.

What are the limitations of the evidence?

In both studies, the groups were very small and there were problems in trial design and reporting. This means that the reliability of the results might be affected. As a result, the evidence for strategies to improve adherence to physiotherapy and adherence to exercise was very uncertain. Whilst these studies suggest that some strategies may be helpful, future research needs to consider ways to accurately measure adherence. In the meantime, physiotherapists treating people with CF should follow local guidelines and national standards of care related to CF and treatment adherence.

How up to date is the evidence?

The evidence is current to 28 March 2023.

Authors' conclusions: 

We are uncertain whether a music-based motivational intervention may increase adherence to ACTs or affect the risk of hospitalisation for a respiratory infection. We are also uncertain whether an educational intervention increases adherence to exercise or reduces the frequency of respiratory infection-related hospital admission. However, these results are largely based on self-reported data and the impact of strategies to improve adherence to ACT and exercise in children and adolescents with stable CF remains inconclusive.

Given that adherence to ACT and exercise therapy are fundamental to the clinical management of people with CF, there is an urgent need for well-designed, large-scale clinical trials in this area, which should conform to the CONSORT statement for standards of reporting and use appropriate, validated outcome measures. Studies should also ensure full disclosure of data for all important clinical outcomes.

Read the full abstract...
Background: 

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-limiting genetic disorder predominantly affecting the lungs and pancreas. Airway clearance techniques (ACTs) and exercise therapy are key components of physiotherapy, which is considered integral in managing CF; however, low adherence is well-documented. Poor physiotherapy adherence may lead to repeated respiratory infections, reduced exercise tolerance, breathlessness, reduced quality of life, malaise and reduced life expectancy, as well as increased use of pharmacology, healthcare access and hospital admission. Therefore, evidence-based strategies to inform clinical practice and improve adherence to physiotherapy may improve quality of life and reduce treatment burden.

Objectives: 

To assess the effects of interventions to enhance adherence to airway clearance treatment and exercise therapy in people with CF and their effects on health outcomes, such as pulmonary exacerbations, exercise capacity and health-related quality of life.

Search strategy: 

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. Date of last search: 1 March 2023.

We also searched online trials registries and the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. Date of last search: 28 March 2023.

Selection criteria: 

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of parallel design assessing any intervention aimed at enhancing adherence to physiotherapy in people with CF versus no intervention, another intervention or usual care.

Data collection and analysis: 

Two review authors independently checked search results for eligible studies and independently extracted data. We used standard procedures recommended by Cochrane and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE system.

Main results: 

Two RCTs (77 participants with CF; age range 2 to 20 years; 44 (57%) males) met the inclusion criteria of this review. One study employed an intervention to improve adherence to exercise and the second an intervention to improve adherence to ACT. Both studies measured outcomes at baseline and at three months, but neither study formally assessed our primary outcome of adherence in terms of our planned outcome measures, and results were dependent on self-reported data.

Adherence to ACTs

One RCT (43 participants) assessed using specifically-composed music alongside ACTs compared to self-selected or no music (usual care). The ACT process consisted of nebuliser inhalation treatment, ACTs and relaxation or antibiotic nebuliser treatment. We graded all evidence as very low certainty.

This study reported adherence to ACTs using the Morisky-Green questionnaire and also participants' perception of treatment time and enjoyment, which may influence adherence (outcome not reported specifically in this review). We are uncertain whether participants who received specifically-composed music may be more likely to adhere at six and 12 weeks compared to those who received usual care, risk ratio (RR) 1.75 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 2.86) and RR 1.56 (95% CI 1.01 to 2.40) respectively. There may not be any difference in adherence when comparing specifically-composed music to self-selected music at six weeks, RR 1.21 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.68) or 12 weeks, RR 1.52 (95% CI 0.97 to 2.38); or self-selected music to usual care at six weeks, RR 1.44 (95% CI 0.82 to 2.52) or 12 weeks, RR 1.03 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.86).

The music study also reported the number of respiratory infections requiring hospitalisation at 12 weeks, with no difference seen in the risk of hospitalisation between all groups.

Adherence to exercise

One RCT (24 participants) compared the provision of a manual of aerobic exercises, recommended exercise prescription plus two-weekly follow-up phone calls to reinforce exercise practice over a period of three months to verbal instructions for aerobic exercise according to the CF centre's protocol. We graded all evidence as very low certainty.

We are uncertain whether an educational intervention leads to more participants in the intervention group undertaking increased regular physical activity at three months (self-report), RR 3.67 (95% CI 1.24 to 10.85), and there was no reported difference between groups in the number undertaking physical activity three times per week or undertaking at least 40 minutes of physical activity. No effect was seen on secondary outcome measures of spirometry, exercise capacity or any CF quality of life domains. This study did not report on the frequency of respiratory infections (hospitalised or not) or adverse events.