Are antiplatelets an effective treatment for people with COVID-19?

Key messages

Antiplatelets are a group of different medicines that can prevent potentially fatal clot formation in the blood vessels ('thrombotic events'). For hospitalised patients with COVID-19, they probably slightly reduce thrombotic events but probably do not affect deaths, clinical worsening or improvement in COVID-19 compared with placebo or standard care.

However, antiplatelets may result in a slight increase in serious unwanted effects ('adverse events') and probably increase major bleeding.

Similarly, in non-hospitalised people, antiplatelets slightly decrease thrombotic events. They may result in little to no difference in deaths or serious unwanted effects, however the evidence on admission to hospital or death and major bleeding events is very uncertain.

There are 14 further studies that have not completed yet, and the results of three other completed studies are not yet available.

What are antiplatelets?

Antiplatelets are a group of drugs which, in different ways, stop blood from changing to a gel-like substance called a clot, which we mean by the term 'thrombotic events'. They are taken mainly by mouth, usually by people who are at high risk of developing a clot (people who have already experienced or who tend to build up a clot).

A clot could lead to a stroke, coronary heart disease, poor blood circulation in the legs, thromboses in the legs or clot obstruction ('embolism') in the lung circulation that could lead to shortness of breath, heart failure and death.

How might antiplatelets treat COVID-19?

People with COVID-19 might be at risk from blood clots. Antiplatelets prevent clots from forming in the body, and this could in turn prevent complications that lead to death and clinical deterioration.

What did we want to find out?

We wanted to know whether antiplatelets in addition to usual care are effective for adults with COVID-19, when compared to usual care with or without a placebo (a treatment that looks and tastes the same as the study drug but with no active ingredient), and whether they cause unwanted effects. We were particularly interested in:

– number of deaths from any cause up to 28 days after treatment, or longer if reported;
– whether people got better or worse after treatment (including unwanted effects of the disease itself, like thrombotic events);
– unwanted effects of the treatment (especially major bleeding).

What did we do?

We searched for studies that reported on people with COVID-19 who received antiplatelets together with usual care, or usual care alone (with/without placebo). We summarised the results of the studies and rated our confidence in the evidence, based on common criteria about the reliability of the evidence.

What did we find?

We identified four studies, including 17,541 people with moderate to severe COVID-19 (hospitalised). Of these, one compared acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) with usual care, two studies compared 'P2Y12 inhibitors' (e.g. clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor) with usual care, and a fourth one compared either acetylsalicylic acid or P2Y12 inhibitors with usual care. The studies included people with a confirmed or suspected diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Two studies compared acetylsalicylic acid to placebo in 4209 non-hospitalised people with confirmed mild COVID-19.

We also found 14 ongoing studies, two studies without published results and another that had been withdrawn after a preprint version. We found no studies that included people with COVID-19 infection but no symptoms.

Main results

Antiplatelets:

– probably make little or no difference to deaths by 28 or 180 days, worsening up to day 28 (new invasive mechanical ventilation or death) or improvement (discharged alive) up to day 28, and they probably slightly decrease thrombotic events;

– may result in a slight increase in serious unwanted effects and probably increase major bleeding events.

In people not in hospital, with mild disease, antiplatelets may result in little to no difference in death within 45 days, or in the incidence of serious adverse events, and they may slightly decrease the incidence of thrombotic events. The evidence for these participants is very uncertain about the effects on worsening (hospitalisation or death within 45 days) and on major bleeding events. Studies did not report on quality of life and general unwanted effects.

What are the limitations of the evidence?

The studies were conducted in populations from high- to middle-income countries, many of them prior to the roll-out of COVID-19 vaccination programmes and before Omicron became the most prevalent variant. We have moderate confidence in the evidence for mortality, worsening/improvement up to day 28, and major bleeding events or thrombotic events in hospitalised people. We have low confidence in the evidence for the effects on serious unwanted effects, because they occurred rarely. For non-hospitalised people, our confidence in the evidence is low for the effects on death, thrombotic events and serious adverse events, and very low for the effects on worsening and major bleeding events (those events were rare and the time period between symptom onset and treatment was long). Information about other unwanted effects and quality of life was not available.

How up-to-date is this evidence?

Our evidence is up-to-date to 22 December 2022.

Authors' conclusions: 

In people with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 and moderate to severe disease, we found moderate-certainty evidence that antiplatelets probably result in little to no difference in 28-day mortality, clinical worsening or improvement, but probably result in a slight reduction in thrombotic events. They probably increase the occurrence of major bleeding events. Low-certainty evidence suggests that antiplatelets may result in a slight increase in serious adverse events.

In people with confirmed COVID-19 and mild symptoms, we found low-certainty evidence that antiplatelets may result in little to no difference in 45-day mortality and serious adverse events, and may slightly reduce thrombotic events. The effects on the combined outcome admission to hospital or death up to day 45 and major bleeding events are very uncertain. Quality of life was not reported.

Included studies were conducted in high- to lower middle-income settings using antiplatelets prior to vaccination roll-outs.

We identified a lack of evidence concerning quality of life assessments, adverse events and people with asymptomatic infection. The 14 ongoing and three completed, unpublished RCTs that we identified in trial registries address similar settings and research questions as in the current body of evidence. We expect to incorporate the findings of these studies in future versions of this review.

Read the full abstract...
Background: 

Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause thrombotic events that lead to severe complications or death. Antiplatelet agents, such as acetylsalicylic acid, have been shown to effectively reduce thrombotic events in other diseases: they could influence the course of COVID-19 in general.

Objectives: 

To assess the efficacy and safety of antiplatelets given with standard care compared to no treatment or standard care (with/without placebo) for adults with COVID-19.

Search strategy: 

We searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register (which comprises MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, medRxiv, CENTRAL), Web of Science, WHO COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease and the Epistemonikos COVID‐19 L*OVE Platform to identify completed and ongoing studies without language restrictions to December 2022.

Selection criteria: 

We followed standard Cochrane methodology. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating antiplatelet agents for the treatment of COVID-19 in adults with COVID-19, irrespective of disease severity, gender or ethnicity.

Data collection and analysis: 

We followed standard Cochrane methodology.

To assess bias in included studies, we used the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) for RCTs. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach for the outcomes.

Main results: 

Antiplatelets plus standard care versus standard care (with/without placebo)

Adults with a confirmed diagnosis of moderate to severe COVID-19

We included four studies (17,541 participants) that recruited hospitalised people with a confirmed diagnosis of moderate to severe COVID-19. A total of 8964 participants were analysed in the antiplatelet arm (either with cyclooxygenase inhibitors or P2Y12 inhibitors) and 8577 participants in the control arm. Most people were older than 50 years and had comorbidities such as hypertension, lung disease or diabetes. The studies were conducted in high- to lower middle-income countries prior to wide-scale vaccination programmes.

Antiplatelets compared to standard care:

– probably result in little to no difference in 28-day mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.05; 3 studies, 17,249 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). In absolute terms, this means that for every 177 deaths per 1000 people not receiving antiplatelets, there were 168 deaths per 1000 people who did receive the intervention (95% CI 151 to 186 per 1000 people);

– probably result in little to no difference in worsening (new need for invasive mechanical ventilation or death up to day 28) (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.01; 2 studies, 15,266 participants; moderate-certainty evidence);

– probably result in little to no difference in improvement (participants discharged alive up to day 28) (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.04; 2 studies, 15,454 participants; moderate-certainty evidence);

– probably result in a slight reduction of thrombotic events at longest follow-up (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.02; 4 studies, 17,518 participants; moderate-certainty evidence);

– may result in a slight increase in serious adverse events at longest follow-up (Peto odds ratio (OR) 1.57, 95% CI 0.48 to 5.14; 1 study, 1815 participants; low-certainty evidence), but non-serious adverse events during study treatment were not reported;

– probably increase the occurrence of major bleeding events at longest follow-up (Peto OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.19; 4 studies, 17,527 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).

Adults with a confirmed diagnosis of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild COVID-19

We included two RCTs allocating participants, of whom 4209 had confirmed mild COVID-19 and were not hospitalised. A total of 2109 participants were analysed in the antiplatelet arm (treated with acetylsalicylic acid) and 2100 participants in the control arm. No study included people with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Antiplatelets compared to standard care:

– may result in little to no difference in all-cause mortality at day 45 (Peto OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.22; 2 studies, 4209 participants; low-certainty evidence);

– may slightly decrease the incidence of new thrombotic events up to day 45 (Peto OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.46; 2 studies, 4209 participants; low-certainty evidence);

– may make little or no difference to the incidence of serious adverse events up to day 45 (Peto OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.64; 1 study, 3881 participants; low-certainty evidence), but non-serious adverse events were not reported.

The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of antiplatelets on the following outcomes (compared to standard care plus placebo):

– admission to hospital or death up to day 45 (Peto OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.10; 2 studies, 4209 participants; very low-certainty evidence);

– major bleeding events up to longest follow-up (no event occurred in 328 participants; very low-certainty evidence).

Quality of life and adverse events during study treatment were not reported.

Health topics: